to navigate Enter to open Esc to close

Investment Calculator: Fees, Inflation and Sequence

A projection, not financial advice. Markets do not deliver a steady annual return, and no calculator can tell you what yours will do. Nothing here accounts for tax, which varies by account type and country. Confirm anything that matters with a regulated adviser.

Two portfolios averaging the same 7.2% over 25 years, with the same $4,000 taken out each year, end at $360,887 and $104,342. The only difference is the order the returns arrived in. A calculator that assumes a fixed rate cannot show you this — and it is the largest risk in any plan that involves withdrawing money.

Investment Calculator

Live

Fees are deducted from the return before it compounds, which is how a real charge works. Set inflation to zero to see the projection in future money instead of today’s.

Value after 25 years, in today’s money

What the projection is made of
Year by year
A steady-return projection. Real markets are not steady — see the section below. Runs entirely in your browser.

The risk a fixed-rate projection cannot show

Two portfolios that both average 7.2 percent over 25 years while 4,000 dollars is withdrawn annually: the one whose good years came first ends at 360,887 dollars and the one whose bad years came first ends at 104,342 $100,000 · $4,000 WITHDRAWN A YEAR · BOTH AVERAGE 7.2% $400k $100k $0 good years first bad years first $360,887 $104,342 year 1 year 25 Withdrawing during a fall sells more units to raise the same cash, and those units are not there to recover. The average return is identical. The gap of $256,546 comes entirely from the order the years arrived in, which is why this risk only exists once you start taking money out.
Both paths use the same set of annual returns in a different order, with $4,000 withdrawn at the end of each year. Computed by running the sequence rather than sketched.
$100,000, $4,000 withdrawn a yearAverage returnAfter 25 years
Good years first7.2%$360,887
Bad years first7.2%$104,342
DifferenceNone$256,546
This risk only exists while you are withdrawing. If you are still contributing, a fall early on is an advantage — the same monthly amount buys more units, and those units recover. The danger runs the other way once the money is coming out, which is why the years immediately before and after retirement matter far more than any other stretch.

What fees actually cost

A fee is charged on the whole balance every year, so it takes the growth that money would have made as well as the money itself. On $10,000 plus $500 a month at 7% over 25 years:

Annual feeFinal valueCost of the feeAs a share
0%$462,290
0.25%$443,178$19,1124.1%
0.5%$424,980$37,3108.1%
1%$391,147$71,14315.4%
2%$332,568$129,72228.1%

A 2% fee does not cost 2%. It costs 28.1% of the final balance. That is the compounding argument turned against you, and it is the reason index funds charging 0.05–0.20% displaced actively managed funds charging 1.5% for most ordinary investors. The fee is also the only number on this page you can change by filling in a form.

Real money and future money

ProjectionIn future dollarsWhat it buys today
25 years at 2% inflation$424,980$259,039
25 years at 2.5%$424,980$229,230 — 46% gone
25 years at 3%$424,980$202,973
25 years at 4%$424,980$159,417

Half a percentage point of inflation is worth $29,808 on that projection — comparable to a meaningful fee difference, and entirely outside your control. A projection in future dollars is not wrong; it simply answers a different question from the one most people are asking, which is what the money will buy.

Where the 7% comes from, and what it hides

AssumptionTypical basisWhat it leaves out
7% a yearUS large-cap history, roughly 10% nominal less 3% inflationThat it is an average of a very wide range, and that it is one country over one period
Steady annual growthMakes the arithmetic possibleMarkets have never done this. Sequence is the risk this hides
Dividends reinvestedStandard in total-return figuresWhether yours are, and whether tax is taken first
No taxDepends entirely on the accountThe single largest omission for a taxable account
You do not sellThe projection assumes disciplineThe behaviour gap. Investors typically earn less than their own funds do
The last assumption is the one that breaks most often. Every projection assumes you hold through the falls. Dalbar’s long-running study finds the average investor earns materially less than the funds they hold, and the gap is behaviour rather than fees: selling after a drop and returning after a rise. No calculator can model this, and it costs more than any input on this page.

Common mistakes

Reading the projection as a forecast. It is arithmetic on assumptions, not a prediction. The honest way to use it is to change one input at a time and watch which one moves the answer most — that tells you where your attention belongs.
Ignoring fees because they are quoted in fractions of a percent. A 2% annual charge removes 28.1% of a 25-year balance. The number looks small because it is quoted per year against a balance that starts small, and it is paid every year against a balance that ends large.
Comparing a projection to today’s prices. Half a million in thirty years is not half a million now. Any projection over more than a decade should be read in today’s money, or the number flatters itself.
Assuming a higher return input is worth chasing. Raising the assumed return raises the projection and does nothing at all to the money. The inputs you actually control are the contribution, the fee and the time — and of those, time is the one that cannot be recovered later.

Frequently asked questions

What return should I assume?

Seven percent after inflation is the conventional figure for a diversified equity portfolio, taken from long-run US history. It is an average of an extremely wide range and it is one market over one period. Running the projection at 5% and 9% as well tells you more than any single number can.

What is sequence of returns risk?

The order returns arrive in, which matters once you are withdrawing. Two portfolios averaging 7.2% over 25 years with $4,000 taken out annually end at $360,887 or $104,342 depending on whether the bad years came first. Withdrawing during a fall sells more units to raise the same cash, and those units are not there to recover.

How much do fees really cost?

Far more than the percentage suggests. On $10,000 plus $500 a month at 7% over 25 years, a 1% annual fee costs $71,143 — 15.4% of the final balance, not 1%. A 2% fee costs 28.1%. The charge applies to the whole balance every year, so it takes the growth that money would have made as well.

Should the projection account for inflation?

If it runs more than a decade, yes. At 2.5% inflation a $424,980 projection buys $229,230 in today’s money — 46% of the headline is purchasing power that will not exist. The calculator above shows both; set inflation to zero for the future-dollar figure.

Is a market fall bad while I am still contributing?

No — it is an advantage. The same monthly amount buys more units at lower prices, and those units recover. Sequence risk runs the other way: it hurts when you are taking money out, which is why the years around retirement matter more than any other stretch.

Does compounding frequency matter much?

Less than people expect. Moving from annual to monthly compounding at 7% is worth about 0.23 percentage points of effective return. That is real but small against a fee difference of 1%, and negligible against the assumed return being wrong by two points.

Why is my actual return lower than the fund’s?

Because a fund reports the return of holding it throughout, and most people do not. Money tends to arrive after a rise and leave after a fall, which mechanically produces a lower personal return than the fund’s published figure. No projection can model this, and for many investors it costs more than fees do.

Is anything I enter sent anywhere?

No. Everything runs in your browser with no server request, and works offline once the page has loaded. Nothing is written to disk and nothing persists after you close the tab.

Sources

  • Bengen WP. “Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data.” Journal of Financial Planning, 1994. The paper that identified sequence of returns as the binding constraint on a withdrawal plan.
  • Cooley PL, Hubbard CM, Walz DT. “Retirement Savings: Choosing a Withdrawal Rate That Is Sustainable.” AAII Journal, 1998 — the Trinity Study, which tested withdrawal rates against historical sequences rather than averages.
  • US Securities and Exchange Commission, investor.gov. The regulator’s own compound interest and fee calculators, and its guidance on how small annual fees compound.
  • Dalbar Inc. Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior, published annually since 1994. The source for the gap between fund returns and investor returns.
  • Formula. With monthly contributions, the balance after each period is balance × (1 + r) + contribution, where r is the annual return less fees divided by the number of periods. Real value is nominal ÷ (1 + inflation)^years.

Every figure on this page is computed from the formulas above rather than quoted, so the article and the calculator cannot disagree. No tax is modelled, because the treatment depends entirely on the account type and the country — and for a taxable account that is the largest omission here.

Related calculators

See the full list of Financial calculators, or try: